WashingtonAmerica.Com

email us:
george@washingtonamerica.com

How come the Supreme Court hasn't grabbed this issue?
Will this whole issue rate a paragraph in history books?
this is a good and relevant question.

Justice Thomas: We are evading the eligibility issue - YouTube
Justice Thomas: We are evading the eligibility issue - YouTube 
 

i think the "president" of obama will at the very least, always will have an asterisk next to his name.

if marco rubio is eligible, then is any "shopping for citizenship" tourist or anchor baby. i've heard sen. ribio say "i'm not going to be the veep nominee" flat out, but without reason. he has not answered my direct question, and i have yet to hear the subject on any mainstream outlet. that goes along with the general blackout by the msm. although lately, i have heard quite a few references to the subject (partly because of the fued between obama and sheriff joe).

the argument now to me, has been boiled down to natural born and born in the country are the same thing, which of course begs the question "why is the word natural even in article two (or article one as joe biden calls it). and why is there a catagory "naturalized".

this is why i have said from the beginning, the supreme court is the only body that can properly deal with this issue. i would also add that the volumes of discussion and the millions of words written and the overall analysis of the question of eligibility, is a harbinger in it's own right. the fact that there is so much controversy is a pwerful case that the issue is not dead.

when the headlines start to read, "why didn't romney pick rubio" will bolster my opinion on that.

since i think any "speculation on eligibility" or one of the gullibles telling me that the eligibility issue is settled law, is rendered moot, i haven't put my energy into studying de vattel, or the cases of minor v happersett, or wong, or even the fourteenth amendment. it doesn't mateer what laypeople think, even the experts.

once again, my interest is very simple, is there any kind of cover up by obama or the democrat party. was the office of senator or president used to cover, hide or misderect anything related to presidential eligibility.

i also believe the subject is becoming less and less tabooed ala alinsky and is awakening in the court of public interest and opinion, which has been my primary focus. i don't think any topic should be ridiculed or intimidated or obfiscated into obscurity. in this country.